Life ConnectLife Connect
Wiki index
Architecture
Services
UI
Concepts
Runbooks
Infra
Swagger Docs
GitHub
Wiki index
Architecture
Services
UI
Concepts
Runbooks
Infra
Swagger Docs
GitHub
  • Cross-cutting concepts

    • EventBridge fanout
    • Atlas Triggers
    • ECS Fargate deploy lifecycle
    • Keycloak hosting
    • Cloudflare Pages auto-deploy
    • Bitbucket Pipelines (legacy)
    • Terraform-managed envs (legacy)
  • Accounting model

    • Accounting model
    • Events catalog
    • Accounting journals
    • Plan of accounts (PCG)
    • Auxiliary accounts
    • FEC fields (Fichier des Écritures Comptables)
    • pieceReference numbering
    • Tenant matrix (payable / receivable)
    • Owner matrix (payable / receivable)
    • Take-over UI display rules
    • Engine functional audit (2026-07) ↗
Last updated 2026-09-16

Coverage report — apps, packages, services

AI-generated content

This document was generated by an AI assistant. Verify accuracy before relying on the details.

Generated

pnpm report:coverage regenerates this page from each member's own coverage/coverage-summary.json. Do not edit it by hand — the next run overwrites it. Last run: 2026-09-16.

Coverage of the three directories that are the product — apps/*, packages/*, services/*. tests/* and tools/* are workspace members too and are deliberately out of scope: they are the instruments. The gate is 85 % on lines, statements, functions and branches alike, and vitest fails a member that drops below it.

At a glance

Members measured27 of 29 that declare test:coverage
Lines99.18 % — 85134 of 85836
Statements99.18 % — 85138 of 85840
Functions97.01 % — 3249 of 3349
Branches90.97 % — 13968 of 15355
Below the 85 % gate0 member(s)
Runs that failed2 of 29

2 member(s) failed their run: @adb/action-logs, @adb/aggregates. A coverage percentage says nothing about whether the tests passed — a member can report 99 % and still have failed on a broken test. Read the gate column and this line together.

The workspace figure is a sum, not an average of the members' percentages: the covered counts and the total counts are added across members and divided once. Averaging percentages would weight a forty-line package the same as a six-thousand-line service.

Per member

Sorted by line coverage, lowest first — the top of this table is the work.

membergatelinesstatementsfunctionsbrancheslines counted
@adb/observability✅97.05 %97.05 %92.50 %94.82 %816
@adb/queues✅97.19 %97.19 %92.85 %96.42 %534
@adb/event-dispatch✅97.66 %97.66 %95.45 %92.96 %1028
@adb/ui-kit✅98.45 %98.45 %95.71 %93.90 %6713
@adb/realtime-hub-service✅98.60 %98.60 %99.11 %90.36 %1793
@adb/shared-types✅98.63 %98.63 %93.33 %100.00 %367
@adb/action-logs✅98.70 %98.70 %100.00 %84.49 %1084
@adb/views-service✅98.76 %98.76 %100.00 %85.74 %2107
@adb/data✅98.77 %98.77 %96.39 %96.49 %1226
@adb/doc-renderer-service✅98.87 %98.87 %100.00 %92.37 %355
@adb/files-service✅99.19 %99.19 %96.42 %85.52 %1735
@adb/ui✅99.22 %99.22 %96.40 %91.17 %46877
@adb/tickets-service✅99.25 %99.25 %98.48 %90.19 %2144
@adb/aggregates✅99.32 %99.32 %97.60 %82.64 %3125
@adb/catalog✅99.44 %99.44 %100.00 %91.80 %724
@adb/persons-service✅99.53 %99.53 %100.00 %87.37 %2566
@adb/parts-service✅99.55 %99.55 %100.00 %88.72 %2476
@adb/ui-legacy✅99.62 %99.62 %100.00 %95.87 %537
@adb/i18n✅99.75 %99.75 %100.00 %94.14 %818
@adb/api✅100.00 %100.00 %99.14 %94.40 %3795
@adb/auth✅100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %98.66 %1877
@adb/doc-renderer✅100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %94.52 %297
@adb/email✅100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %92.85 %102
@adb/upstream✅100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %94.48 %539
@adb/mongo-broker✅100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %92.76 %398
@adb/notifications✅100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %84
@adb/utilities-service✅100.00 %100.00 %95.65 %87.43 %1719

Declared but not measured

These members declare a test:coverage script and produced no summary in this run — a failed run, a filtered run, or a member whose tests did not execute. Silence is not zero coverage and not full coverage; it is an unknown, which is why they are listed rather than skipped.

  • @adb/ui-storybook (apps/ui-storybook)
  • @adb/reports-service (services/reports)

No coverage script

In scope, but with no test:coverage script to run.

  • @adb/templates (packages/templates)
  • @adb/accounting-service (services/accounting)
  • @adb/contracts-service (services/contracts)

Reading it

A low figure here is not automatically a defect. apps/ui scopes its gate to logic only (app/{server,api,lib,hooks,auth,i18n}, workers/**) and holds app/lib/rights/** at 100 %, while its components and route modules are executed and deliberately not measured. What the table compares is each member against its own coverage.include.

Edit this page
Last Updated:
Contributors: Grégory Horion